similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to ctaipd.org

Ctaipd alternatives & similar sites

Instruction and Professional Development (IPD) - CTA — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
urbaneducoach.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Urban EDU Coach – Professional Development For Educators	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
carriewozniak.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Dr. Carrie Wozniak - Professional Portfolio - Home	en	education Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonathancoats.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Jonathan Coats, M.Ed. \| Motivational Speaker – Facilitator\| Youth Empowerment \| Professional Development \| Leadership Team Building	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acteducators.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Association for Constructivist Teaching – ACT: A professional education organization	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
discountsupplementssite.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	How to Navigate the Australian Educational Landscape for Community Development \| Discount Supplements Site	AU~ en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
swotifyplus.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	SWOTIFY+ — Institutional Student Growth Infrastructure	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
academicdevgroup.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Academic Development Group – Promoting education through diverse programs.	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4educational.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	4Educational -- Search for Education Resources, Courses, and Tools	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dreamjobfoundation.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	AI4Good \| Open-source AI for education and employment equity	US~ en	education	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csiepub.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Case Studies in International Education	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ableistift.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	A Bleistift FOR EVERYONE \| Education for children in developing countries	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nationalschoolforms.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	National School Forms	en	education BigCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
academic-action.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Academic Action \| International Education Partnerships Between the UK and Latin America	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
actionteaching.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Action Teaching	en	education Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
barbara-bingham.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Barbara Bingham \| educator \| student \| leader	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lucindahandshoe.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Lucinda Handshoe – Education Theory, Instruction Methods, Restorative Classrooms	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nationalachiever.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	National Achiever Services	US~ en	education WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ayasuperstore.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	AYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE SUPERSTORE	en	education Wix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.