Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ct-devs.com

CT Devs | Full-Stack Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
90match
buildwithatul.dev
Atul | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
85match
ab-key.com
Andy | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
85match
abhishekdev.tech
Abhishek Sonje | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
84match
creavibe.dev
Shaharyar | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
84match
buildwithkode.com
Karthik — Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
84match
abir-hasan.com
Abir Hasan | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
84match
aaronarenas.dev
Aaron Arenas | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
84match
creidenberg.com
John Doe - Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
84match
angeljuarez.dev
Angel Juarez | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
juliandurian.com
Julian Schubert (Durian) | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
abbasmohsen.com
Abbas Mohsen | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
83match
abhisekdutta.com
Abhisek Dutta | Full-stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
abidev.dev
Mohamed Amine Abid | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
eghermanne.com
Enzo Eghermanne | Full-stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
aalokshaw.dev
Aalok Shaw - Full-Stack Developer & Entrepreneur
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
oznuryilmaz.com
Öznur Yılmaz | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
aakashkalla.tech
Aakash - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
4dmu.dev
4Dmu — Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.