similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to ct-aca.org

Ct Aca alternatives & similar sites

Connecticut Adult Children of Alcoholics & Dysfunctional Families. – ACA — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Substance Abuse →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
aapwa.org ↗	81 match 1 shared topics	AAPWA – Association of Alcoholism and Addiction Programs	en	substance-abuse WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
absolutionsolution.com ↗	81 match 1 shared topics	The Absolution Solution – An Online Group of Alcoholics Anonymous	en	substance-abuse WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aahernando.org ↗	81 match 1 shared topics	Hernando County Intergroup – of Alcoholics Anonymous	en	substance-abuse WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aacentraliowa.org ↗	81 match 1 shared topics	AA Central Iowa – Alcoholics Anonymous	en	substance-abuse WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
absolutesgroup.com ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Absolutes Group of Alcoholics Anonymous \|	en	substance-abuse WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aamysore.org ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Alcoholics Anonymous – Mysore	en	substance-abuse WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
aaonmv.org ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	The Martha's Vineyard Groups of Alcoholics Anonymous	en	substance-abuse WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aacogf.org ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Central Ohio Group Fellowship – Alcoholics Anonymous	en	substance-abuse WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
aabengaluru.org ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Alcoholics Anonymous – Bangalore	en	substance-abuse WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aabuffalo.info ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	The Buffalo Group of Alcoholics Anonymous, Buffalo, NY	US~ en	substance-abuse	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aacentralohio.org ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Central Ohio Group Fellowship – Alcoholics Anonymous	en	substance-abuse WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
aatopeka.org ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	District 8 and Greater Topeka – Alcoholics Anonymous	en	substance-abuse WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aanorcal.org ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	NorCal Intergroup – Northern California Fellowship of Alcoholics Anonymous	US~ en	substance-abuse WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctrecoveryresidences.org ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Home - Connecticut Alliance of Recovery Residences	en	substance-abuse WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aa-acadiana.org ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Acadiana Central Office – Alcoholics Anonymous in the Acadiana Area	en	substance-abuse WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aablueridge.org ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Virginia's Blue Ridge Area Intergroup of Alcoholics Anonymous	en	substance-abuse WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
aawvdistrict3.org ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	AA WV District 3 – Alcoholics Anonymous in District 3 Area 73	en	substance-abuse Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aamadisonwi.org ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Madison Area Intergroup Central Office – Alcoholics Anonymous	en	substance-abuse WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.