similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to cswithvarun.com

Cswithvarun alternatives & similar sites

Engineering Security at the Speed of Innovation — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jmpsec.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	JMP Sec \| Security Engineering Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnsoudi.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	aspiring security engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
systemsecurityengr.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	THE SYSTEMS SECURITY ENGINEERING GROUP - Home	en	information-and-network-security Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hasplabs.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Hasp Labs — Security Architecture & Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
useqastenai.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Senior Engineering & Security Consultants	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
useqasten.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Senior Engineering & Security Consultants	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joesullivansecurity.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Joe Sullivan Security \| Building Resilience in the Age of Innovation	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pioneeringsoftware.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Pioneering Security	US~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
0xsha.io ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	0xSHA · Security Research & Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hatshelf.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Backend Security Engineering in Depth	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
defensivelayer.net ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Siddhant Tupe \| Cyber Security Architect & Engineering Leader	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joeadamsphilly.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Joe Adams \| Security Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qcic-group.co.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Global security engineering company \| QCIC Security Assured	GB en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qcicgroup.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Global security engineering company \| QCIC Security Assured	GB en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qcicgroup.co.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Global security engineering company \| QCIC Security Assured	GB en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qcic-group.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Global security engineering company \| QCIC Security Assured	GB en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
suryaviyyapu.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Surya Viyyapu \| Security Engineer	en	information-and-network-security Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nanotechx.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	NanoTechx - Cybersecurity Innovation & Protection	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.