Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to crispsoftware.in

Crisp Software · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
jmpsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
JMP Software
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
djayasoftware.com
Djaya Software
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
beetux.com
Beetux Software
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
73match
shiryusoftware.com
Shiryu Software
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
73match
alliedsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Allied Software
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
hedricksoftware.com
Hedrick Software
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
nautilussoftware.com.br 🇧🇷
Nautilus Software
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
rey-ss.com
Rey Software Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
synergisticsoftware.com.au 🇦🇺
Synergistic Software Index
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
sharmeem.com
Sharmeem || Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
div-ks.com
DIV Group - Software Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
diversifiedsoftwaresolutions.tech
Diversified Software Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
68match
shedlandsoftwaredesign.co.uk 🇬🇧
Shedland_Software_Design
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
oceansoftwaredigital.com
Ocean Software Digital (Pvt) Ltd.
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
67match
ocean-software.com
Ocean Software Digital (Pvt) Ltd.
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
67match
rewferguson.com
Robert Ferguson: Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
creative-software.co.uk 🇬🇧
Creative Software | Manchester, UK
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
7elmak.com
7elmak - Software & Digital Services
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.