Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to creekmore.dev

Morgan Creekmore · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
aaccurso.me
Alan Accurso
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
mtfelisb.com
mtfelisb - mtfelisb
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
acerosalazar.com
Felix J. Acero
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andrewsturman.com
Andrew Sturman | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
lornaparry.com
Lorna Parry Student Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
adamnengland.com
Adam N England – Professional Software Engineer, Amateur Human Being
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
bukno.com
indentit
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
muhammadfahri.com
Home | Muhammad Fahri
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
bugarin.dev
bugarin
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
simonrahnasto.com
Simon Rahnasto | Online CV
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
lucaswing.com
Lucas Wing's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
lonfarr.com
Lon Farr's Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
jrbenriquez.com
John Rei Enriquez - John Rei Enriquez
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
medmo.co.uk 🇬🇧
Matt Edmonston - Freelance Software Engineer in Kent, United Kingdom
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
camerondoyle.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cameron Doyle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
egisca.com
Egisca – Software Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
sidntrivedi.com
Home • Siddhant N Trivedi
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrezsanchez.com
Software, mathematics, language, and more.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.