Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to creativeadjacency.com

Creative Adjacency | Jacy Cochran | Substack · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
andrewmyrman.com
Andrew Myrman | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
recursiveanimal.com
Recursive Animal | Ash Jones | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
lookbooksnacc.com
Book Snacc | Alex Howe | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
animaveritas.org
Shoshana Abelman | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
thebookofluke.com
The Book of Luke 📖 | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
thebibliophile.com
The Bibliophile | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
ecthewriter.com
EC's Double Entry | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
loveletterstoamerica.com
Love Letters to America | Arash Ayrom | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
thebookishman.com
thebookishman.com | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
eileencahill.com
Eileen Cahill | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
coursonreads.com
Courson Reads | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
oxforddawn.com
Oxford Dawn | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
adamvoith.com
Adam Voith Memos | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
courtagonist.com
Courtny- Mostly Making It | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
terselore.com
terse lore | raj samuel | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
theasteroidagenda.com
Ryan TAA | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
lostinthemetro.com
Maren’s Book Reviews & More | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
adeloye.com
Anthony Adeloye | Substack
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.