Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to crazyengineers.com

Home | CrazyEngineers · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
cotadev.io
Home | CoTA
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
testyengineer.com
The Testy Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
jread.dev
Jamie Read | Engineering Lead
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
lukeudell.com
Home | Command Center
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
loudquack.com
LoudQuack - The Hub for Software Engineers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
ackerworx.dev
AckerWorx Engineering
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
corvlio.com
Home | Corvlio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
tezedge.com
Home | Tezos
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
tezos.com
Home | Tezos
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
burakkanber.com
Burak Kanber, Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
adrianmiles.io
Adrian Miles - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
simonwaite.com
Home | Simon Waite
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
3iotherapeutics.com
Home | 3io
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
acasysdev.com
Home | ADC
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
cosainttech.com
Home | RTX
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
aksr.dev
Home | AKSR
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
alexander-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
alex-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.