similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to crawland.com

Crawland alternatives & similar sites

Crawland — API infrastructure for smarter web intelligence — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
develust.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Develust.com \| Secure Digital Infrastructure & Development	AZ~ en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
zynthlab.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	ZynthLab - Web Development & Cybersecurity Company \| Software, Security & Infrastructure	LK~ en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
usemonarc.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Monarc — Website Vulnerability Scanner, Posture & Compliance for SMEs	en	web-development	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
hashirax.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	HashiraX \| Cybersecurity, Secure Web Development, AI & Cloud — Worldwide	IN~ en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 16
cyber-ops.co.uk ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Independent, developer focussed penetration testing specialist for web, api and mobile security - Mothax Ltd.	GB en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
synorointel.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home - Synorointel	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
awarenessally.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Awareness Ally — ADA & WCAG Compliance Scanner	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demigodcybersec.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Demigod Cybersec	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samprati.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Samprati Gaurav — Student, Builder & Cyber Thinker	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
urlexaminer.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	UrlExaminer — Website Audit Bureau	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caspicasoft.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	caspicasoft - Web developer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanctus-solutions.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Dallas Cybersecurity & Web Design \| Sanctus Solutions - Securing Your Digital Sanctuary \| Sanctus Solutions	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
0dayslash.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	0DaySlash — Web3 Security Audits	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cwsecuredesigns.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	CW Secure Designs \| Web Design & Digital Security Consulting	en	web-development WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bayou.im ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Welcome to Bit Bayou	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
achyutamweb.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Home \| AchyutamWeb – Building Unbreakable IT & Security.	en	web-development WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
barisyildizoglu.net ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Alchustan	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nathanielzcooper.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Experienced Cybersecurity Expert & AI Enthusiast \| Website Design \| Nathaniel Zinah Cooper	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.