Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to crausser.com

Claire Rausser | Product Design Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
bydustinwang.com
dustin wang | product design portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
78match
juanmondragon.com
Juan Mondragon | Product Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
78match
adambunce.com
Adam Bunce | Product Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
byscotty.com
scott yu-jan | product design portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
egepulat.com
Ege Pulat Portfolio | Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
ejmillerportfolio.com
EJ's Product Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
eerobrandt.com
Eero Brandt’s product design portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
murielhaldenby.com
Muriel Haldenby - Product Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
julesdbennett.com
Product Design Portfolio — Jules Bennett
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
mrbenchman.com
Toms Varpins Product Designer portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
juanreal.com
Juan Real | Product Design Manager | Portfolio 2023
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
mtweiner.com
Michele Weiner | Product Design Lead
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
fuinteraction.com
Yuwei Fu - Product Design Leader - Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
el-domo.com
El Domo - Product Design Agency
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
annualdesigncompetitions.com
Travel Product Design Awards
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
loristevenson.com
Lori Stevenson Product Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
a-na.net
Ana Jeličić - Product Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
bykristinmartin.com
Kristin Martin Design Portfolio | Product Designer in Indianapolis
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.