Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to crath.com

Shane Reustle · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
akshansh.me
Akshansh Bhatt
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
terrygodier.com
Terry Godier
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
adamburkeware.net
Adam Burke’s Software Notes | Notes on software and research.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
abildgaard.com
abildgaard.com -
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
simonbreiter.com
Simon Breiter | Projects
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
atinyox.com
Tony Xia
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
buildartifact.com
Alex Lowe | I help build software products, teams, and companies.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
loweorg.com
Alex Lowe | I help build software products, teams, and companies.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
linuxlabslimited.co.uk 🇬🇧
Linux Foundation - Decentralized innovation, built with trust
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
simonlb.com
Simon Leboucher
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
remelehane.dev
Reme Le Hane | Flutter Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
futureadylabs.com
Future Ready Labs
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
gabrielgiani.com
Gabriel Giani
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
ltratcliff.com
TR
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
alexgrover.me
Alex Grover
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
adamdavidson.me
Adam Davidson
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
alexconst.net
Alexandre Constantino's blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bruits.org
Bruits
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.