Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to craigrettig.com

Craig H. Rettig - Introduction · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
rilay.dev
Introduction
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
csdevlab.com
Introduction – Nextra
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
ebeena.com
Introduction – Nextra
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
ecmrapi.com
Introduction – Nextra
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
frontendproduction.com
Frontend Production
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
craigkahle.com
Craig Kahle
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
andrewpettigrew.com
Andrew Pettigrew
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
oxibug.com
Oxibug - Infinite Code
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
oxybug.com
Oxibug - Infinite Code
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
sierraui.com
Sierra UI — Production-Ready Components
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
muhammadbaz.com
Muhammad Baz - Laravel Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
rickcardoso.com
Ricardo Cardoso | Product Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
brunolm.com
About - Bruno Leonardo Michels (BrunoLM)
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
bugstack.ai
Production Bug Fixes as Tested Pull Requests | bugstack
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
build-with-deepak.com
Deepak Jha — Solution Architect & Fractional CTO
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
craigcahill.com
Craig Cahill
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andymcguinness.com
Andy McGuinness | Support Engineer & Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
abidmaqbool.com
Muhammad Abid Maqbool | Full Stack Developer, Systems Architect & Independent Researcher
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.