Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to craigmclay.com

Craig McLay – Author Page · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
authorjenhallett.com
JH – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
78match
authorkellylstone.com
Kelly Stone – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
77match
terripicone.com
Terri Picone – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
77match
jumbolives.com
Kendra Coulter – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
77match
authorseddique.com
Author Home Page
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
76match
juliarambharose.com
Julia Rambharose – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
76match
austinchant.com
S. A. (Austin) Chant – author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
jylkoh.com
Julie Koh | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
authorreshundadawson.com
Reshunda Dawson Author Page
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
alexismoon.net
Alexis Moon – Author – Aspiring Author Central
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
rebekaheyre.com
Rebekah Eyre Author Page
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
sipngrabyouabook.com
Author Lala B.
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
authormiaford.com
Author Mia Ford
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
authorclairconway.com
Clair Conway – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
jswik.com
J.S. Wik - Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
authormegeliza.com
Author Meg Eliza
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
authorcarolroth.com
Home Page for Author Carol Roth
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
authorkarahope.com
Author Website
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.