Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to craighaber.dev

Craig Haber | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
adrianlara.org
Adrian Lara | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
simonesiega.com
Simone Siega | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
eddiefuller.com
Eddie Fuller | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
juriw.com
Juri Welz - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
juridedej.com
Juri Dedej | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
pahasara.dev
Pahasara - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
theabgarg.com
Abhishek | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
louguzman.dev
Luis | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
juanakira.com
Juan Ákira | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
abubakar-noorulhassan.com
Software Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
reganmuthomi.com
Regan Muthomi | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
abhisheksharma.me
Abhishek Sharma | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
egecanozer.dev
Egecan Özer | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
reicolee.com
Reico Lee | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
calebbellmyer.com
Caleb Bellmyer | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
0xomer.com
Omer | Software Engineer & Instructor
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
abrilberliando.com
Abril Berliando | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
luanpanno.dev
Luan Panno | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.