Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to cotinga.com

COTINGA - Start · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
59match
leapvision.io
Leapvision – Immobilien schneller verkaufen mit Digital Twins
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryreal-estate-industry
55match
arminiusgroup.com
Arminius | Wir gestalten Stabilität. Für Investoren. Für Immobilien.
1 co-citations1 shared categoryreal-estate-industry
55match
naefpartner.com
Naef & Partner | Immobilienentwicklung, Bauherrenvertretung, Portfoliomanagement
1 co-citations1 shared categoryreal-estate-industry
55match
katharinenkai.com
Projekte: MOMENI Group
1 co-citations1 shared categoryreal-estate-industry
55match
bette-immowert.com
Bette-Immowert - Immobilienbewertung objektiv und neutral
1 co-citations1 shared categoryreal-estate-industry
42match
aretemakina.com
Arete Machine
1 co-citations2 shared techmanufacturing-industry
42match
leapvision.app
Leapvision – Immobilien schneller verkaufen mit Digital Twins
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryreal-estate-industry
42match
dreitakt.io
Dreitakt Consulting für Unternehmen in Bewegung
1 co-citations2 shared techmanagement-consulting-industry
41match
madelconsulting.com
madel consulting – Strategie- und Innovationsberatung mit KI
1 co-citations1 shared techmanagement-consulting-industry
41match
hanischconsulting.com
KI‑Beratung und KI‑Plattform für den Mittelstand | Hanisch Consulting
1 co-citations2 shared techmanagement-consulting-industry
41match
bvnconsulting.com
- Startseite
1 co-citationsmanagement-consulting-industry
40match
dagesi.dev
Gerald Siegwart · Biotechnologie & Digital Transformation
1 co-citations1 shared techbiotech-and-biomedical-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.