Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to cotafa.com

(주)코타파 · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
42match
cellstorypro.com
BeaurenKorea
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
42match
cos-up.com
cos-up에 오신걸 환영합니다.
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybeauty
40match
dhucosmetic.com
자안
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
39match
bakhainc.com
cosble
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybeauty
39match
cospouch.com
코스파우치
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
bottleforyou.com
(주)에스아이피
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybeauty
38match
lapivu.com
(주)라피부
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
38match
cosmejeju.com
제주인증화장품
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
37match
cellabis.com
셀라비스 - CELLABIS
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
36match
medilabderma.com
메디랩 더마
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
35match
jaminkyung.com
자민경
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorynatural-and-organic-beauty
35match
allcaremall.com
올케어몰
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
35match
agecaremall.com
에이지케어
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
35match
dfhkorea.com
링클리(LYNKLY)
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorynatural-and-organic-beauty
35match
cosmedician.com
(주)코스메디션
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
34match
cosinkorea.com
화장품 뷰티 전문 미디어 코스인코리아닷컴
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybeauty
33match
cellpiamall.com
셀피아몰 | Cellpia - 줄기세포배양액 화장품
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryskin-care
32match
bonabay.com
보나베이
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorybeauty

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.