Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to cosmicsoftware.de

COSMIC Software · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
cooc-software.de 🇩🇪
CooC Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
foxlogic.de 🇩🇪
FoxLogic Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
cm-software.de 🇩🇪
CM Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
dke-software.de 🇩🇪
DKE Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
cube-software.de 🇩🇪
Cube Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
egon-software.de 🇩🇪
EGON SOFTWARE
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
falk-software.de 🇩🇪
Falk Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
fakt-software.de 🇩🇪
FAKT Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
falksoftware.de 🇩🇪
Falk Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
deltatecc-software.de 🇩🇪
deltatecc Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
diehl-software.de 🇩🇪
Diehl Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
dedukt-software.com
dedukt Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
chitinsoftware.de 🇩🇪
Chitin Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
dedukt-software.de 🇩🇪
dedukt Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
faster-software.de 🇩🇪
FASTER Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
bytesun.com
Bytesun Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
crystal-software.de 🇩🇪
Crystal Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
emwe-datascience.de 🇩🇪
eMWe BI Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.