Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to coretek.com

Coretek | Home · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
94match
docpipes.com
Coretek | Home
5 co-citations11 shared tech1 shared categorycloud-computing
52match
betterthanservices.com
Home
2 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorycloud-computing
48match
3d-products.com
CloudFiles
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorydata-storage-and-warehousing
48match
nbs-us.com
End-to-End Cloud ERP Software Solutions
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
47match
appdeliveryworks.com
F5 Networks | AppDeliveryWorks.com
3 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryinformation-and-network-security
46match
culvergroupings.com
Culver Group Consulting | Microsoft Teams, Modern Workplace, and Azure
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorycloud-computing
46match
erpinazure.com
Home - 2WTech
3 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-and-computing
45match
nbsemail.com
End-to-End Cloud ERP Software Solutions
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
45match
nbsus.com
End-to-End Cloud ERP Software Solutions
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
45match
altorcloud.com
AltorCloud Homepage
3 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorycloud-computing
44match
websecurityworks.com
Trellix's Products and Solutions | WebSecurityWorks.com
3 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categoryinformation-and-network-security
44match
abhilashavyas.com
Abhilasha Vyas
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.