Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to coredb.com

CCSI · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
ishqcorp.com
Info Systems Headquarters Corp. home page
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
clydedata.co.uk 🇬🇧
clydedata
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
evacdm.com
Codatum - Collaborative data notebook unlocks the potential of data
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
surefootdata.com
Surefoot Consulting: FileMaker design • development • training
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
doclinx.com
Doclinx — Enterprise Search & XML at Scale
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
data-craft.co.uk 🇬🇧
Datacraft Homepage
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
annexbox.com
AnnexBox
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
istway.com
IST Inc | Database Development
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
supremedatasolutions.com
Supreme Data Solutions | Information Delivered
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
discindodata.com
Discindo Data Solutions
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
divinesystems.com
Divine Systems - BI/Data Engineering Services
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
dnhbi.com
DNH BI — Independent BI Developer
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
shibatadb.com
Shibata – Service Transition to Custom Research Services
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
database-publishing.co.uk 🇬🇧
Database Publishing with CatBase
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
dinesql.com
Puzzling out your data problems - dinesqlwebv3
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
georgemooreconsulting.com
Custom Database Development | George Moore Consulting
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
m4allc.com
M4A - Home
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
cdb-solutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
CDB SOLUTIONS - Tailored Database Support Home
1 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.