Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to coreangels.com

Angel Funds Around The World | COREangels · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
66match
alloypartners.com
Alloy Partners | Co-Create Advantaged Startups Through Venture Building
3 co-citations7 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
63match
myprobuddy.com
MyProBuddy - Raise Funds Like a PRO with Your ProBuddy
4 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
61match
angellistindia.com
AngelList India | India's leading platform for investing in startups
4 co-citations7 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
61match
0labs.io
Zero Labs — Building Nevada's Venture Ecosystem
2 co-citations7 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
60match
fiercetechfounders.com
Fierce - Accelerating women-founded tech startups.
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorystartups
58match
jazariventures.com
Jazari Ventures | Industrial Venture Builder
4 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
58match
filterbuyventures.com
Home - Filterbuy Ventures
4 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
58match
latribuinc.com
LATRIBU - Ignite your vision. Fuel your growth.
3 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
58match
dnoinvestments.com
DNO Investments | Strategic Growth Investments
3 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categoryprivate-equity
58match
endurance28.com
Endurance28 – Entrepreneurs first
4 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorystartups
57match
autacapital.com
Home - Auta Capital
4 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
57match
angelstarventures.com
Angel Star Ventures
2 co-citations7 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.