Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to corazonlanting.com

Cora Lanting — Product Manager & Builder · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
aleksandralazovic.com
Aleksandra Lazović — Product Manager
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
ninaulagdesigns.com
Nina Ulag — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
mehedihassain.com
Mehedi Hassain — Product Designer & Builder
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
byiglesias.com
María Iglesias — Product Maker
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
meirmax.com
Max Meir — Product Manager & Explorer | Hong Kong
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
meaganmorris.com
Meagan Morris - Product Manager & UX Professional
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
nmfolio.com
Nafiz Mannan — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
meetluka.com
Luka Dadiani | Product Manager & Senior Designer — London
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
alessandrapriolo.com
Alessandra Priolo | Product Manager
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
dougdesigns.com
Douglas Hiller — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
nikigrewal.com
Niki Grewal — Product Designer & Builder | Figma + Claude Code
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
fflurpage.com
Fflur Page | Product & Brand Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
filipinodesigner.com
Filipino Designer | Product Designer & Manager
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
akhileshsaurabh.com
Akhilesh — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
noahhadley.com
Noah Hadley — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
jieliu-design.com
Jie Liu — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
levexon.com
Levexon — Digital Product Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
studiomusen.com
Musen Lin — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.