Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to copyscape.com

Copyscape Plagiarism Checker - Duplicate Content Detection Software · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
52match
awerum.com
Awerum Software Company
5 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
52match
avadhinnovations.com
AVADH INNOVATIONS | Software Development Company
5 shared tech1 shared categoryweb-development
52match
cairocodes.com
CairoCodes Software
5 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
52match
eonoia.com
EONOIA | Software Development Company
5 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
52match
4eses.com
4ESES - Seafood Sector Software Solutions
5 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
52match
midasinfotouch.com
Midas Infotouch - Software Development Company
5 shared tech1 shared categoryweb-development
52match
embedded-elements.com
Embedded Software Development
5 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
52match
macuncle.com
MacUncle . Mac Software to Convert Migrate & View Mac Data files
5 shared tech1 shared categoryemail
52match
danielgivney.com
Daniel Givney - Experienced Software Developer and IT Manager - Resume
5 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
52match
enrii.com
Enrii IT Solutions | Software Development for Startups and Large Enterprises
5 shared tech1 shared categoryweb-development
52match
awesomitylabs.com
Awesomity | Leading IT and Software Development Company
5 shared tech1 shared categoryweb-development
52match
crmhike.com
Best CRM Software For All Business - CRMHike
5 shared tech1 shared categorysoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.