Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to cooth.com

Home - Cooth · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
42match
famarketinggroup.com
Corey Keating Marketing – Elite Marketing for Financial Advisors and Boutique Asset Managers
12 shared tech2 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
40match
apple7media.com
Home - Apple7Media
9 shared tech2 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
38match
ivory-enterprises.com
California Business Management Consulting Company | Sale
12 shared tech2 shared categorymanagement-consulting-industry
38match
ganiconsulting.com
Home - GANI Consulting
10 shared tech2 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
38match
5elementmarketing.com
Home - 5 Element Marketing
8 shared tech2 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
37match
azulconnectionsinc.com
Azul Connections Inc. - Business Development Services NV
12 shared tech2 shared categorymanagement-consulting-industry
37match
christohaas.com
Startup Brand Consultant | Strategic Systems That Drive Growth
10 shared tech2 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
37match
christoco.com
Startup Brand Consultant | Strategic Systems That Drive Growth
10 shared tech2 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
36match
csnevents.com
HOME - CSN
5 shared tech2 shared categorymanagement-consulting-industry
36match
gadetetou.com
Gade Tet ou - Marie Flore Lindor-Latortue Ph.D.
9 shared tech2 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
36match
crescendoconsultings.com
Crescendo Consultings Inc. - Direct Sales and Marketing Company
10 shared tech2 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
36match
magnovamn.com
Home - Magnova Inc
13 shared tech1 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.