Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to cooperip.com

Patent Attorneys & Trade Mark Attorneys | Cooper IP · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
63match
jahanilaw.com
Jahani Law | Maritime, Civil Litigation & Immigration Lawyer
4 co-citations7 shared tech2 shared categorylaw
58match
emergevoc.com
Vocational Evaluations for Attorneys, Veterans, and Individuals - Emerge Vocational Services
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorylaw
58match
kasharlaw.com
Personal Injury Attorney in Dallas - The Kashar Law Firm, P.C.
4 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categorylaw
57match
dailylawgroup.com
Home - Daily Law Group Design
4 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categorylaw
55match
chauvellaw.com
Business, Employment & Estate Planning Attorneys in San Mateo County
4 co-citations7 shared tech2 shared categorylaw
55match
fariasfirm.com
Personal Injury Lawyer & Workers Comp Lawyer in Tarzana - Farias Firm
4 co-citations7 shared tech1 shared categorylaw
55match
mikhaelavocat.com
Mikhael Avocat INC | Immigration Lawyer | Joint Divorce Lawyer | Business Lawyer | Montreal | Gatineau
4 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categorylaw
55match
guidolawoffice.com
Guido Law Offices
3 co-citations7 shared tech2 shared categorylaw
54match
bullardlawgroup.com
Bullard Law Group, PLLC – Always Accessible, Always Closing
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorylaw
53match
karlaw.com
Home - karlaw
4 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorylaw
53match
guerrallp.com
Home - GUERRA LLP
4 co-citations6 shared tech2 shared categorylaw
52match
galvanilegal.com
Intellectual Property, Patent & Trademark Attorney Phoenix, Arizona
3 co-citations4 shared tech3 shared categorylaw

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.