Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to coolbirdstudios.com

CoolBird Publishing House · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
knpublishinghouse.com
KN Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
76match
dlpublications.com
Research Hub - Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
75match
ishmaeltree.com
Publishing House - Ishmael Tree
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
geomares-marketing.com
Geomares Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
odopublishing.com
ODO Publishing House - Publisher
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
henhousepublishing.com
Hen House Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
magicpub.com
MagicPublishing Home Page
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
esdpub.com
ESD Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
campuspublishing.com
Campus Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
izzipublishing.com
IZZI PUBLISHING
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
oakhousepublishing.com
OAKHOUSE PUBLISHING CO.
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
shergon.com
SHERGON Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
camelliapress.com
Camellia Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
resonantgroup.com
::: Resonant Publishing :::
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
diopress.com
Publishing | DIOPress
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
reservepublishing.com
Reserve Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
nuovonova.com
NuovoNova Ltd. | Independent Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
eupublishinghouse.com
EU Publishing House - Expert Book Publishers in Europe
1 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.