Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to conundrumgroup.com

Home | The Conundrum Group · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
caledoniaba.com
Home | CaledoniaBA
2 shared topicsbusiness
64match
gemba-alumni.com
Home | GEMBA News Letter
2 shared topicsbusiness
64match
dipjar.com
DipJar | The Cashless Fundraising Solution for Giving
2 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
64match
swapthegame.com
Home - Swap The Game Institute
2 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
64match
swhenterprises.com
Home | Smiling With Hope Enterprises
2 shared topicsbusiness
63match
b2bab.com.au 🇦🇺
Home - B2BAB
2 shared topicsbusiness
63match
plgiving.com
Home - PL Giving
2 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
63match
eplayfilmes.com.br 🇧🇷
Home - ePlay▸®
2 shared topicsbusiness
63match
bearingtree.com
Home - Bearing Tree
2 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
62match
moneydolly.com
MoneyDolly - The Smarter Fundraising App
2 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
62match
andrewnetworks.com
HOME - Andrew Networks
2 shared topicsbusiness
62match
ethoscrm.com
Home Page - Ethos CRM
2 shared topicsbusiness
62match
connectapp.io
Homepage - ConnectApp.io
2 shared topicsbusiness
62match
helmsocialvalue.com
Home - HELM Social Value
2 shared topicsbusiness
62match
giftedsolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
The CRM Without Constraints - Gifted Solutions
2 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
62match
gaywarren.com
Home - GFWC-NC Membership
2 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations
62match
helptogethergroup.com
Help Together Group – Help Together Group
2 shared topicsbusiness
62match
communitymemberservices.com
Home
2 shared topicsnon-profit-organizations

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.