similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to contentmaker.ch

Contentmaker alternatives & similar sites

Content und Texte für Web, SEO, Print I Contentmaker — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Content Production →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
agenturprima.de ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	New Content \| Rückenwind für Ihre Kommunikation \| Text, PR und Content-Marketing in Potsdam	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaronbrueckner.de ↗	62 match 3 shared topics	Dr. Aaron Brückner - Autor, Berater und Creator	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jochenbrenner.de ↗	48 match 2 shared topics	Momentum: Content und Kommunikation mit Charakter	Germany de	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beeli-consulting.ch ↗	47 match 2 shared topics	Gian Beeli Creative Content Consulting	Switzerland de	content-production Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janinebrauneis.de ↗	46 match 2 shared topics	Janine Brauneis - Content, Übersetzung, Marketing	Germany de	freelance-writing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
julianebrosz.de ↗	46 match 2 shared topics	Juliane Brosz – Freie Redakteurin – Content und Konzept	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexpriess.de ↗	46 match 2 shared topics	Alex Priess \| Text und Konzept \| Freier Werbetexter \| München	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ccberlin.com ↗	46 match 2 shared topics	Freelancer für Konzeption und Text - Corporate Communication Berlin	de	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aitexter.de ↗	45 match 2 shared topics	AI-Texter: Ich erstelle Content mit KI-Power und menschlicher Note!	Germany de	content-production WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ahtext.de ↗	45 match 2 shared topics	Professionelle Texterin für PR und Marketing in München	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
julius-leichsenring.de ↗	45 match 2 shared topics	Julius Leichsenring – Text und Strategie	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
juliascales.de ↗	45 match 2 shared topics	Startseite - einfach gute Texte auf Deutsch und Englisch	Germany de	freelance-writing Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3kandt-lektorat.de ↗	45 match 2 shared topics	Lektorat für Wissenschaft und Werbung \| 3KANDT Lektorat	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3kandt.de ↗	45 match 2 shared topics	Lektorat für Wissenschaft und Werbung \| 3KANDT Lektorat	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jakobkibala.de ↗	45 match 2 shared topics	Jakob Kibala \| Unbedingt Text	Germany de	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jpmk.de ↗	45 match 2 shared topics	jürgen preiß – Content für Dein Business	Germany de	content-production WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1acontent.de ↗	45 match 2 shared topics	1aContent	Germany de	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
voigtantje.com ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	Antje Voigt - Copywriting- und Contentagentur \| Copywriting- und Contentagentur	de	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.