Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to consmaga.com

Inicio - CONSMAGA · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
cadcid.com
Inicio - Cadcid
2 shared topicscivil-engineering-industry
74match
estudio3n.com
Inicio -
2 shared topicscivil-engineering-industry
74match
constructorajoregoga.com
INICIO - Constructora Joregoga
2 shared topicscivil-engineering-industry
74match
construcaminos.com
inicio - construcaminos.com
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
74match
esmecom-ep.com
Inicio -
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
74match
estru.com
Inicio - estruconsult
2 shared topicscivil-engineering-industry
74match
aimservicios.cl 🇨🇱
Inicio - AIM
2 shared topicscivil-engineering-industry
74match
compealgroup.com
Inicio - Compeal Group
2 shared topicscivil-engineering-industry
74match
obenropeaccess.com
Inicio - OBEN
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
74match
coningersas.com
Inicio - coningersas.com
2 shared topicscivil-engineering-industry
74match
consultingingenieria.com
Inicio - Consulting Ingeniería
2 shared topicscivil-engineering-industry
74match
dimsgrupo.com
Inicio - DIMs
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
73match
montebiancord.com
Inicio - Constructora Montebianco
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
73match
rigaimpulsora.com
Inicio - Riga
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
73match
construmaxstudio.com
Inicio - ConstrumaxStudio SA de CV
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
73match
ocansa.com
Inicio - OCANSA
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
72match
consa.pe
Inicio | CONSA
2 shared topicscivil-engineering-industry
71match
modulo11.com
Inicio - Modulo 11
2 shared topicscivil-engineering-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.