Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to connerneedham.com

conner needham | creative & art direction · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
itslaurenbarr.com
Lauren Barr Portfolio - Creative & Art Direction, Design
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
annettedennis.com
Annette K. Dennis - Graphic Design & Art Direction
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
esthersexcellentsolutions.com
Home | Creative Director
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
camilashoji.com
Camila Shoji - Creative Art Director
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
conniez.com
Connie Zhou | Art Director
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
svetmateev.com
ART DIRECTION
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
itskjoachim.com
Kimberly Joachim | Creative Director Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
riaucreativehub.com
Riau Creative Hub
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
monicacasamor.com
Mònica Casamor. Art director
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
annacevallos.com
Anna Cevallos | Senior Art Director
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
andreapalaciosf.com
andrea palacios f - art direction | set design | production design | art installations
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
heralee.com
HERA LEE | Visual Design & Art Direction
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
lysidiumcreative.com
Lysidium Creative
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
sharonmosheattias.com
Sharon Moshe Attias - Creative & Director
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
caljerell.com
CJ Villaflor | Art Director and Content Creator | Metro-Detroit
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
shinathegreat.com
S_K — CREATIVE DIRECTION BY SHINA KENOGBON
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
antartoon.com
Anthony Artoonian Art Director Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
gdetassis.com
Ginevra Detassis - Art Director
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.