Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to connerarmour.com

Conner Armour | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
connorburri.com
Connor Burri | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
iteksoylu.dev
Ibrahim Teksoylu | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
aalenoza.com
Aaron Zamora | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
antipotion.com
Antipotion | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
calculated-code.com
calculatedCode | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
antaresjeet.com
Ranjit | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
3raul.com
Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ethanowens.dev
Ethan Owens - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
0xomer.com
Omer | Software Engineer & Instructor
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ankanpal.com
Ankan Pal | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
konin.dev
Max Konin | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
gedasga.com
GedasGa | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
anestiandoni.com
Anesti Andoni | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
heinsoe.com
Hein Soe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
reuss.dev
Tobias Reuß | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
isosman.com
Islam Osman | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
aaronjasperson.com
Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
sharmayash.com
Yash Sharma | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.