Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to confluencesoftware.com

Confluence Software, LLC · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
essa-software.com
ESSA Software, LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
rhyolite.com
Rhyolite Software, LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
jackalopeventures.com
Jackalope Software, LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
madcat.com
MadCat Software, LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
evermindsoftware.com
Evermind Software, LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
resiliencesoftware.com
Resilience Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
bearpeak.com
Bear Peak Software, LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
surpassingsoftware.com
Surpassing Software, LLC
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
remittancesoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Remittance Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
cafe-software.com
Cafe Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
cafesoftware.org
CAFE SOFTWARE
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
dime-software.com
Dime Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
magesw.com
Mage Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
nytesoftware.com
Nyte Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
site-software.co.uk 🇬🇧
Site software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
hopesoftware.in 🇮🇳
Hope software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
gecsoftware.com
GEC Software, Inc.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
ecommercesoftware.org.uk 🇬🇧
Ecommerce Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.