Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to condris.com

HOME - Condris · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
compaijen.com
Home - Compaijen
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
72match
commawerkt.com
Home - Comma Werkt
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
71match
calanza.com
Home - Calanza
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
70match
monto.com
Home - Monto
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
69match
aanhogerwal.nl 🇳🇱
Home - Coaching en Advies
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
69match
platinor.com
Home - Platinor
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
69match
sharmant.com
Home - Sharmant
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
69match
aartsip.nl 🇳🇱
Home - Aarts IP
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
68match
3e-advies.com
home - 3E Advies
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
68match
rich-bond.com
Home - Rich Bond
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
68match
3badvies.nl 🇳🇱
Home - 3B Advies
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
68match
abmadvies.nl 🇳🇱
Home - ABM Advies
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
68match
maaikemiedema.com
Home - Maaike Miedema
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
68match
pm-projects.com
Home - Mijn website
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
67match
maartentieben.com
Home - Maarten Tieben
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
67match
shapethehorizon.com
Home - Shape the Horizon
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
67match
thebg.be 🇧🇪
Home - The Brain Group
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
67match
thebraingroup.be 🇧🇪
Home - The Brain Group
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.