Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to conact-group.com

Start - ConAct Group · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
tigamedia.at 🇦🇹
Start - TIGA Media
1 shared topicshuman-resources
69match
tigamedia.de 🇩🇪
Start - TIGA Media
1 shared topicshuman-resources
67match
plesenic-crm.com
Start - Plesenic-CRM
1 shared topicshuman-resources
67match
competinnov.com
Startseite
1 shared topicshuman-resources
66match
directbrorecruiting.com
Startseite -
1 shared topicshuman-resources
66match
hey-brorecruiting.com
Startseite -
1 shared topicshuman-resources
65match
fairplusservice.at 🇦🇹
Startseite - Fairplusservice
1 shared topicshuman-resources
65match
wep-professional.de 🇩🇪
WEP Professional – Startseite -
1 shared topicshuman-resources
65match
steinhart-consulting.at 🇦🇹
Home • Steinhart Consulting
1 shared topicshuman-resources
64match
concludis.com
High Volume Recruiting - Concludis
1 shared topicshuman-resources
64match
united-workers.de 🇩🇪
Ameko Projekt - Start
1 shared topicshuman-resources
64match
mobilejobs.at 🇦🇹
Startseite
1 shared topicshuman-resources
64match
beconact.com
www.beconact.de - beConAct
1 shared topicshuman-resources
64match
octagon-hr.com
Home | OCTAGON
1 shared topicshuman-resources
64match
octagon-personal.com
Home | OCTAGON
1 shared topicshuman-resources
64match
timetracking-online.de 🇩🇪
Startseite - TimeTracking Online
1 shared topicshuman-resources
64match
itpersonalberatung.com
Personalberatung und Personalvermittlung - Die Experten für die IT-Branche
1 shared topicshuman-resources
64match
jobstart.at 🇦🇹
Jobstart Executive Search | JobStart Executive Search
1 shared topicshuman-resources

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.