Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to con-or.com

Conor O'Riordan — Astrophysicist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
gautamknaik.com
Gautam Naik | Theoretical Physicist
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
ankita-anirban.com
Ankita Anirban | Writer, Editor, Physicist
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
suribhagvantam.com
Suri Bhagavantam – Indian Physicist
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
anshul-bhg.com
Anshul Bhargava – One curious physicist.
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
espresearch.com
Russell Targ - ESP Research - Author & Physicist
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
riccardomariabianchi.com
Riccardo Maria Bianchi | PhD, Particle Physicist
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
conormccoid.com
Conor McCoid
2 shared topicsscience
64match
conorolive.com
Conor E. Olive
2 shared topicsscience
64match
macenulty.com
Lórien MacEnulty – Computational Physicist
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
maddoxspinelli.com
MADDOX.EXE — Theoretical Nuclear Physics
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
heidithiele.com
Heidi Thiele — Applied Physics & Mechanical Engineering
2 shared topicsscience
64match
shinichiroyano.com
Shinichiro Yano – A physicist thinking with wiriting
2 shared topicsphysics
63match
richardmeasey.com
Richard Measey — A Complete Physics from First Principles
2 shared topicsphysics
63match
andrea-barbiero.com
Andrea Barbiero - engineer and quantum physicist | Andrea Barbiero
2 shared topicsphysics
63match
a-p-tech.com
Applied Physics Technologies
2 shared topicsscience
62match
ethionova.com
Explore My Physics Journey | Nova
2 shared topicsphysics
62match
superlit.io
SuperLit - Physical Observability
2 shared topicsphysics
62match
heterostructure.com
Hyuck | Physics Research Portfolio
2 shared topicsphysics

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.