similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to compoundintent.com

CompoundIntent · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

contentuncovered.com

Content Uncovered

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

contenthouseorlando.com

The Content House

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

contentbookstore.com

Content Bookstore

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

compositionandcoffee.com

Composition & Coffee

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

contentelevated.com

Karen Farrelly: Content Elevated

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

a1bookbinding.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

beccandrake.com

Becca N. Drake | Author and Composer

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

dintywmoore.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Copious Components - Angela R Anderson

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

contentgeek.com

Content Geek - A collection of content

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

aniciamcfarlane.com

Anicia McFarlane

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Fionn. Han 〄 composer．book designer

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Founding Reader Society — Read them before they're published

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

andrea-louis.com

Next.js Hello Blog Example with Contentful

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.