Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to compcamps.com

CompCamps · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
compasjs.com
Compas
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
campo-computing.com
Campo Computing
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
componentdojo.com
ComponentDojo
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
compoundjs.com
CompoundJS
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
odnmalau.com
Fransiscus Rolanda Malau
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
compiletab.com
CompileTab
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ocampogeric.com
Ocampogeric
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
estebanborai.com
Esteban Borai | Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
callicoder.com
Programming, Web development, System design & Devops Tutorials | CalliCoder
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
cameronmcdougal.com
Cameron McDougal - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
compuguy.dev
CompuGal99 - Embedded Software Engineering with a Passion
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
odysian.dev
Chris Colosimo | Programming & Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
djamware.com
Ionic Java Rust Quarkus Grails MongoDB Javascript Angular Node React Vue.js
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
anjaramihone.com
Anja Ramihone : Front-End Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
0xpuddu.com
Alessandro Porcheddu | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
beareact.dev
Welcome! | Be A React Dev
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
caliphdev.com
Home | Caliph Dev
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
hertzen.com
Niklas von Hertzen
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.