Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to comontouch.com

Com'On Touch – Depuis 2011 · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
evataboada.com
Eva TABOADA – Design d'espaces
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
monsieur-mcompany.com
Monsieur M – King of Kind Com' portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
kokolo.com
Kokolo – L'expression Tech'Style
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
j-lab.fr 🇫🇷
J-LAB – Design / Infographie
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
design-graphik.fr 🇫🇷
Peggy Sevcik – design graphik
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
cometstick.com
Com&stick – Com&stick
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
esthesiedesign.com
Esthésie – Design & Fantaisie
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
gazelle-creation.com
Virginie . J – Gaz'Elle Création
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
maevariba.com
Maeva Riba – Designer graphique
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
cestpourquoi.fr 🇫🇷
C'EST POURQUOI – design global & pouvoir d'agir
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
cozal-design.fr 🇫🇷
COZAL – design volume packaging
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
lagencelf-data.fr 🇫🇷
L'agence LF – Espace professionnel
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
laustudio.fr 🇫🇷
Lau Studio – Designer graphique
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
anthony-guerree.com
Anthony Guerrée – Design Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
maeliger.com
Mael IGER – Conception d'éclairage
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
sherine-elsol.com
Sherine El Sol – design graphique
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
morganekerninon.com
MORGANE KERNINON – Design graphique
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
barrau.fr 🇫🇷
BARRAU Gravure – Artisan graveur depuis plus de 20 ans à Lyon
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.