Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to commonsware.com

CommonsWare · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
commonswear.com
CommonsWare
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
heyeduardo.com
Eduardo Rocha | Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
modsefa.com
Modsefa
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
helabenkhalfallah.com
Code, Craft & Community - Sharing my journey in software development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
objectionable-c.com
Objectionable-C | Objectionable-C
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
3xion.dev
Nolan Stone
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
hexraj.com
Muhammad Raj | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
nvkhuy.com
nvkhuy
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ivaliullin.com
Welcome to Ilsur's blog! | Ilsur Valiullin
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
anishneema.com
Anish Neema - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
anuchito.com
All posts | AnuchitO Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
dkasa.dev
David Kasakaitis
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
pixcoders.com
Rafal Spacjer blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
commandapi.dev
CommandAPI
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
commentari.dev
Commentari
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
israelcruz.dev
Israel Cruz - blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
obedmacallums.com
Obed Macallums
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
ethtechtree.com
ETH Tech Tree
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.