Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to comg.com.br

Comg – Editora · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
machadoeditora.com
Editora Machado – Editora Machado
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
estacaopovoar.com
Estação Povoar – Editora Estação Povoar
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
direitoefilosofia.com
Verlu Editora
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
direitoefilosofia.com.br 🇧🇷
Verlu Editora
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
helloameli.com
Amelì Editora
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
bceditora.com
Home - BC Editora
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
resolve-reparos.com
resolve – resolve
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
escritosavulsos.com
LACAN – ESCRITOS AVULSOS
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
modestosa.com
Modestosa – A VOLTA!
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
nvidal.com
Natália Vidal – Blog
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
escritorpaulocorrea.com
PAULO CORREA – escritor Paulo Correa
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
andredeleones.com.br 🇧🇷
Andre de Leones – info
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
editoraonline.com.br 🇧🇷
Grupo On Line Editora
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
jacobpetry.com
Jacob Petry – Jacob Petry
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
equipeeditora.com.br 🇧🇷
Home da Equipe Editora -
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
ancestreeditora.com
Início | Ancestre Editora
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
gwpublicacoes.com.br 🇧🇷
GW Publicações - Editora
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
revistasubversa.com
Subversa: Revista e Editora
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.