Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to colingigl.com

Colin Gigl | Sorry, it's "Guy-gull". I know, we're all a little disappointed · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
phsolomon.com
Welcome to Archer's Aim - Archer's Aim
2 shared topicsfantasy
62match
adws.io
A Donut with Sprinklez – Because I don't know what I am doing either
2 shared topicsfantasy
62match
bludgeonedtodeath.com
Bludgeon Author | sword and sorcery
2 shared topicsfantasy
62match
clpolk.com
clpolk.com – a fantasy writer's carefully undisturbed website
2 shared topicsfantasy
62match
nickchild.com
YA Fantasy Fiction Author Nick Child - Stories for that cross to Other Realms | Nick Child
2 shared topicsfantasy
62match
robertekreig.com
Robert E Kreig - Fantasy and Speculative Fiction
2 shared topicsfantasy
62match
theojmalloy.com
Theo J. Malloy
2 shared topicsfantasy
62match
andymorrall.com
Home - Andy Morrall
2 shared topicsfantasy
62match
benspencerwrites.com
Ben Spencer – Writer of Fantasy Fiction
2 shared topicsfantasy
62match
ajmccrae.com
A.J. McCrae | Author
2 shared topicsfantasy
62match
mattlanewrites.com
Home - Matt Lane - Fantasy Author
2 shared topicsfantasy
61match
cmcornwell.com
HOME | C.M. Cornwell | Author & Writer
2 shared topicsfantasy
61match
maureenbonatch.com
Welcome - Author Maureen L. Bonatch
2 shared topicsfantasy
61match
cllauder.com
C. L. Lauder | The Quelling
2 shared topicsfantasy
61match
dmcain84.com
Immersive fantasy fiction – Epic sword & sorcery fantasy from UK author D.M. Cain
2 shared topicsfantasy
61match
fatmalcolm.com
Home - Matt Falcon
2 shared topicsfantasy
61match
fcclay.com
Author Website | F C Clay
2 shared topicsfantasy
61match
mattfalcon.com
Home - Matt Falcon
2 shared topicsfantasy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.