similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to cogsafe.org

Cogsafe alternatives & similar sites

COGSEC — Cognitive Security for Leaders — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
activecogsec.com ↗	81 match 1 shared topics	ACTIVE COGSEC — Cognitive Security for Elite Minds	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mindlockr.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Mindlockr \| The Cognitive Security Layer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kylekoza.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Kyle Koza — Cybersecurity Leader	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clawguard.net ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	ClawGuard — Security for OpenClaw	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trivsec.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	TrivSec — Cybersecurity for EU & Middle East Businesses	Sweden~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
absolvesecurity.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Absolve Security - Home	en	information-and-network-security Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
roupe.io ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Roupe - a Security Leader's Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
streetwiseinfosec.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Streetwise InfoSec — Cybersecurity for the Rest of Us	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
stonehavenops.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Stonehaven Operations, LLC — Intelligence-Led Security & Protective Operations	United States~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1ransom.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	1RANSOM - Fractional Security Leadership	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
romanromanenco.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Roman Romanenco — Product & Security Leader	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
packetmoat.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Packet Moat - Simple Security for Everyone	en	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rootvector.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	RootVector — Offensive Security Intelligence	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
advnce.app ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	ADVNCE - Security Operations	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rohit-borate.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Rohit Borate \| Offensive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drawbridgepartners.co.uk ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity for Alternative Investments \| Drawbridge	United Kingdom en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
cyoptix.io ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Cyoptix \| AI-Enhanced Security for Healthcare IoT	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acsp4u.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity Leadership for Regulated Organizations \| ACSP	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.