Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cognittiv.com

Home - Cognittiv · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
bioenfapesp.org
Home - BIOEN
1 shared topicsscience
63match
clickinclusao.com
Blog - Click Inclusão
1 shared topicsscience
62match
fatosexplicados.com
Fatos Explicados
1 shared topicsscience
62match
pesquisalivre.com
Pesquisa Livre | O Futuro da Ciência Aberta
1 shared topicsscience
62match
clubesdeciencias.com
Rede Internacional de Clubes de Ciências
1 shared topicsscience
62match
inspectto.com
Inspectto - Ciência e Tecnologia
1 shared topicsscience
62match
abcterra.com
Início - ABC Terra
1 shared topicsscience
62match
blogibcgepa.com
Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisa em Adaptação – INSTITUTO BENJAMIN CONSTANT
1 shared topicsscience
61match
fatosfera.com
Fatosfera - Curiosidades, ciência e fatos interessantes sobre o mundo
1 shared topicsscience
61match
blogdaciencia.com
Blog da Ciência - Um universo por descobrir.
1 shared topicsscience
61match
nemalgarve.com
NEMA | Portugal
1 shared topicsscience
61match
acertte.org
REVISTA CIENTÍFICA ACERTTE - ISSN 2763-8928
1 shared topicsscience
61match
sobreisto.com
Sobre Isto
1 shared topicsscience
60match
artha-research.com
Artha Research is a committed cosmetic CRO
1 shared topicsscience
60match
labinfos.org
LabInfoS — Laboratório de Informática em Saúde
1 shared topicsscience
60match
martinelliprojeto.com
Projeto Observatório Martinelli
1 shared topicsscience
60match
societyandscience.com
Society & Science
1 shared topicsscience
60match
aldemararaujo.org
UsinaDePesquisa – Usina de Pesquisa: Planejar, Executar e Divulgar Pesquisa na Área da Saúde!
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.