Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codymcafee.com

Cody McAfee | Front End Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
devperks.io
Developer Perks
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
devbookclub.com
Developer Book Club
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
developerbookclub.com
Developer Book Club
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
angrycat-design.com
Full Stack Developer Portfolio | John Traas
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
designdev.io
DesignDev.io - Design & Development Blog
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
malchiel.com
Daniel Rodrigues - Full-Stack Developer & Digital Strategist | Cambridge, MA | Inspire.rd
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
malchielrodrigues.com
Daniel Rodrigues - Full-Stack Developer & Digital Strategist | Cambridge, MA | Inspire.rd
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
nathanbeekman.com
Nathan Beekman | Front-End Practice Lead
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ilokhov.com
Ivan Lokhov
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
63match
arma73.tech
Portfolio | aomi's Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
63match
democratizework.com
Home | Harry Keller
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
nasifsalaam.com
Nasif Salaam | Design Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
63match
derekmei.com
Home · Derek Mei
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
63match
devmotives.com
Home - Dev Motives
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
anmoldeep.dev
Anmoldeep Singh
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
pchabits.com
PCHabits – Application and WordPress them and website development
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
eugenebadato.com
@eugenebadato
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
extend-ui.com
Extend UI
3 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.