Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codowd.com

Connor Dowd · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
mattmasten.com
Matt Masten
1 shared topicseconomy
65match
kumaranand.com
Kumar Anand
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
arlingtonvirginiausa.com
Arlington-Virginia-USA - Business and Economic Forum
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
pierrefink.com
Pierre-Christian Fink
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
rxdkin.com
Insights on finance, tech, and economic trends with market forecasts. - rxdkin.com
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
matlabist.com
Hang Qian | Econometrician
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
soundinglineecon.com
Sounding Line Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
afea1.org
HOME
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
alexandereconomicviews.com
Alexander Economic Views – Economic and financial commentary that you can trust
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
ditraglia.com
Francis J. DiTraglia
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
robinlenoir.com
Robin Lenoir - Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
sabinsubedi.com
Sabin Subedi - Applied Microeconomics & Development Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
bolteconomy.com
Bolt economy
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
nicolascogorno.com
Nicolás Cogorno - Development Economist and Data Scientist
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
ryurm.com
Decoding economic indicators and delivering insightful financial market analysis. - ryurm.com
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
abbring.org
Jaap H. Abbring | Professor of Econometrics at Tilburg U Managing Editor of The Econometrics Journal Fellow of CEPR, IAAE, and Econometric Society
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
nicholaswpapageorge.com
Nicholas W. Papageorge
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
sophiamo.com
Sophia Mo
1 shared topicseconomy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.