Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codingwithnate.com

Nate Scott | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
akuakonadu.org
Akua Konadu | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
79match
kylewinn.com
Kyle Winn · Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
andrewjzajac.com
Andrew Zajac | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
abzn.io
ABZN - Software Engineering
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
ahmadsoboh.org
Ahmad Soboh - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andrewgarcia.dev
Andrew Garcia | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
arieljtyson.com
Ariel Tyson · Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ahmetgenc.dev
Ahmet Genc - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andreykh.app
Andrey{K}h - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andreykh.net
Andrey{K}h - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andreykh.io
Andrey{K}h - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
arslanameer.com
Arslan Ameer | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
kuhsaai.com
Qasim Muhammad — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
felipedearaujo.com
Felipe de Araujo | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
cmiguel.com
Carlos Miguel Fernando | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
bilalkhalid.dev
Bilal Khalid — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
alfredoptarigan.tech
Alfredo Patricius Tarigan | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
theolujay.dev
Joseph Ezekiel - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.