Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codewithpeter.com

Piotr Brudny — Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
andreitalpa.com
Andrei Talpa — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
amy-decoded.com
Amy Kwak — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
andrewbolles.com
Drew Bolles — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
andrewbrysonbolles.com
Drew Bolles — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
adilraqioui.tech
Adil Raqioui — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ethanloh.com
Ethan Loh — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
andreafuso.dev
Andrea Fuso — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
azamattashu.dev
Azamat Tashu — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
chheung.com
chheung — software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
devdreams.io
Gabriel Perez — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
3lt.dev
3LT — Software Engineering Studio
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
devkapoor.com
Devansh Kapoor — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ilkerbalcilar.com
ilker balcilar — software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ahsaanullah.dev
Ahsaan Ullah — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
derekthe.dev
Derek Montgomery — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
cheekane.com
Brian Park — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
devnoah.com
Noah Ramey — Sr. Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
adamwoodcock.tech
Adam Woodcock — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.