Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codewithcc.com

Portfolio Website - Code with Cc · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
pixelesdev.com
Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
alexdametto.dev
Alex Dametto | Personal Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
mathieuschrurs.com
Mathieu Schrurs Portfolio website
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
roberthayeportfolio.com
Robert's Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
fatemahridi.com
Personal Portfolio Website - Easy Tutorials
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
nicholasdabreau.com
Nick Dabreau - Portfolio Website | Nick Dabreau
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
achyuth-prabhakar.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
nextsaimon.com
Saimon – Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
alexcusenza.net
Alessandro Cusenza's Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
mastacoder.com
My Portfolio | Makan
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
ashishguleria.tech
Ashish Guleria Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
nguyenanhtuanle.com
Portfolio - Nguyen Anh Tuan Le
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
abdullahshzd01.com
Abdullah Shahzad - Personal portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
a1seon.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
labinotveseli.com
Portfolio | Labinot Veseli
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
romisebastian.com
Portfolio Web Design
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
cocarmon.dev
Portfolio | Cody Carmony
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
nicholasawebster.com
Nicholas A. Webster | Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.