Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codevert.com

Codevert · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
fayetyson.com
Faye Tyson – Game Production and Development
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
aroragames.com
Arora Software - Software development and game design.
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
artemkorovkin.com
Artem Korovkin
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
faustofonseca.com
Fausto Fonseca
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
famousaspect.com
FamousAspect - Game Development Explained
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
ktgdeveloper.com
KTG-Development
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
benjaminhardy.dev
Benjamin Hardy – Learning game development
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
roguecatstudios.com
Rogue Cat Studios
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
maxbennett.dev
Max Bennett – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
mateigiurgiu.com
Matei Giurgiu – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
cluttercloudgames.com
ClutterCloud Games – game developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
maxstuerzl.com
Max' Blog – Me and Gamedevelopment
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
pikeplacestudios.com
Pike Place Studios – Design and Development
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
bombinabox.com
BombInABox – Development Blog
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
7lives.net
7lives
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
8quacks.com
Quack Quack Quack Quack Quack Quack Quack Quack
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
dobermannstudios.com
Dobermann Studios
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
pineboxgames.com
Pinebox Games | Indie Game Development & Services
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.