Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codelogistics.net

Satvik Patwardhan's Website · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
benedicthenshaw.com
ben's website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
alaskanemily.net
Alaskan Emily's Website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
aleggett.me
Aaron Leggett's website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
arifluthfi.com
Arif's Website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
100daysofcode.com
#100DaysOfCode Official Website | #100DaysOfCode
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
phoresl.com
Personal website of Orest Smertnyi
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
dataviz.co.uk 🇬🇧
Educational Website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
masontate.com
My CPSC 3750 Website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
pippodima.com
Curriculum - My Website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
abigailsarath.net
Abigail's Awesome Website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andyoldham.net
Andy Oldham - Personal Website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
0xbuidlerhq.com
0xhq
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewburger.net
Andrew Burger · The personal website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
roanh.dev
Home | Roan's Site
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
robertebonham.com
Robert Bonham
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
digitaldan.co.uk 🇬🇧
DigitalDan - Home Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
ackx.net
Sugoi! - Youri Ackx
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
lighthosting.co.uk 🇬🇧
SquidDev | SquidDev
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.