Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codekobold.io

home | codekobold.io · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
bluehood.dev
home | codekobold.io
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
abdel.me
Home | Abdel
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
neurotiko.com
Home | rock
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
rollingcoders.com
HOME | default
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
nickangeli.com
Home | Nick Angeli
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
softwareninjaneer.com
Home | Ahmad Mageed - Software Ninjaneer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
rohinibarla.com
Rohini Kumar Barla
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
romainardiet.com
Home | romain ardiet
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
roanh.dev
Home | Roan's Site
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
5pence.net
Home | 5pence coding mentor blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
thelondoncoder.com
The London Coder
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
thepeopleprogrammer.com
Home | Ben WHITEHOUSE
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
roblouie.com
roblouie | Thoughts, ideas, and tutorials on software development. Mostly JavaScript.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
assertivescript.com
Home | Assertive Script
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
blueeyeten.com
Home | My Personal Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
domeengine.com
Welcome | DOME
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
matthiasn.com
Home | Matthias Nehlsen
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
dochoffiday.com
Home - AJ Hoffer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.